so lucky
Garden Master
A little positive reinforcement, eh, Red? 
Home gardens designed like agricultural operations, What?!?!?!
- Thread starter jasonvivier
- Start date
Nyboy
Garden Master
- Joined
- Oct 2, 2010
- Messages
- 21,365
- Reaction score
- 16,241
- Points
- 437
Like always @Smart Red well said !!!!!
thistlebloom
Garden Master
- Joined
- Dec 1, 2010
- Messages
- 16,473
- Reaction score
- 17,395
- Points
- 457
- Location
- North Idaho 48th parallel
I'm not sure I understand what you mean by this SeedO. Are you responding to @Lavender2 s comment about not wanting to introduce some of the invasives on Jasons list?
TheSeedObsesser
Deeply Rooted
Yes I am.
TheSeedObsesser
Deeply Rooted
Just finished watching through it all; and I mostly, if not completely, agree with what he is saying in general. I like how he incorporates wood mulch into his setup. Thank you for posting that!
Now, to find that second video...
Lavender2
Garden Addicted
Oh yeah, I was going to respond to that.
In my opinion it is very important to consider what plants you introduce to any land. I should clarify, the plants listed are not invasives but most are aggressive and non-native. I grow or have grown about 75% of that list, in a controlled garden. I know what will happen if pretty much any combination of the plants would be introduced into a native woodland. So, do I destroy the ecosystem and native plants that are already there, for my benefit?
I have blueberries, raspberries, cherry bush, rhubarb, several herbs, BES, Echinacea, etc. on the other side of my property...where we cleared invasive reed canary grass out. In my experience from growing aggressive plants, I'm not imagining how you would design those into what would be considered a stable ecosystem and a happy self regulating garden... and still get the greatest benefits from the foods you are growing.
No offense to anyone, just my experience and opinion.
- Thread starter
- #37
jasonvivier
Garden Ornament
Oh yeah, I was going to respond to that.
In my opinion it is very important to consider what plants you introduce to any land. I should clarify, the plants listed are not invasives but most are aggressive and non-native. I grow or have grown about 75% of that list, in a controlled garden. I know what will happen if pretty much any combination of the plants would be introduced into a native woodland. So, do I destroy the ecosystem and native plants that are already there, for my benefit?
View attachment 6424
View attachment 6425
I have blueberries, raspberries, cherry bush, rhubarb, several herbs, BES, Echinacea, etc. on the other side of my property...where we cleared invasive reed canary grass out. In my experience from growing aggressive plants, I'm not imagining how you would design those into what would be considered a stable ecosystem and a happy self regulating garden... and still get the greatest benefits from the foods you are growing.
No offense to anyone, just my experience and opinion.
A couple questions worth asking are...
Given climate change are the current ecosystems worth saving if we can expect them to be unable to regulate themselves in the decades to come? (I have no opinion on this currently but it is a valid question.)
Native to when?
Stable ecosystems should never be destroyed for forest gardens. Only land that is already damaged, like lawns are suitable for such a thing. And natives are always the priority. In this case we a talking about the intersection of two things. Damaged native ecosystems and feeding people.
- Thread starter
- #38
jasonvivier
Garden Ornament
I have blueberries, raspberries, cherry bush, rhubarb, several herbs, BES, Echinacea, etc. on the other side of my property...where we cleared invasive reed canary grass out. In my experience from growing aggressive plants, I'm not imagining how you would design those into what would be considered a stable ecosystem and a happy self regulating garden... and still get the greatest benefits from the foods you are growing.
No offense to anyone, just my experience and opinion.
And I suppose to answer this question we need to look at a couple things;
- A plants shape, both above the ground and below
- which nutrients and chemicals are created by a plants leaf fall and roots respectively.
- Understanding a plants niche and specifically requirements for continued growth.
- Which species are specific plants habitats for, both above the ground and below.
- Does the plant allow for mychrorizal interface? Which type?
- What factors prevent growth?
- And how do all of the plants on the list meet the needs of each other and the species the live on, above, and below them.
- What are the beneficial interactions?
bobm
Garden Master
Wouldn't the time it would take to complete this type of study, and then to take action by hand weeding the un-deisreable plants, only WEEDS would cover the entire area by out- competing the desired plants then we would have very few edible blueberries, raspberries, cherries, rhubarb, or herbs to eat ?
At this point, wouldn't the cost of the edible items be so expensive that we couldn't afford to eat these crops as evidenced at the current much higher cost of these items that we have to now pay ? Many desireable edible plants are not always the best survivors of the fittest ! 
Last edited:
Lavender2
Garden Addicted
I have an opinion... Climate change 'predictions' are based on history and observation...it is quite apparent to me that history and observation has proven that destroying our native ecosystems is not a good idea.
I am relatively certain you know what native/indigenous implies.
In my case, my woodland is part of a protected native wetland area of regional importance, DNR evaluated and zoned. Yes, it is my property and I can do as I wish with it, except for buildings and disturbing protected plants. We chose to respect it's native status.
