seedcorn said:
vfem said:
I personally have no problem with junk food, long as its labeled junk food, and not covered in pretty pictures of healthy apples and bananas when its just sugar!
You have to be told it's junk food? I look at ingredients and make my own determination.
So are hot fudge sundaes a good food since it has calcium, proteins, etc????
This reminds me of a year when I was assigned to teach a middle sch. health class because of budget cuts in the art dept. (which consisted of Me). When the kids were assigned to make a menu, they could not understand why they should not list ketchup as a vegetable. Ketchup, onions, french fries or chips= 3 servings of veggies, white bun=carbs, burger=meat, cheese=dairy. So one Happy Meal=balanced meal, assignment complete. This was the same class that after being told that alcohol depletes B vitamins, had a guy ask,seriously, "Is that why you drink orange juice with your vodka?"I remember getting nauseous from the smell of barbeque potato chips that one kid would eat around my desk during homeroom. That was breakfast...with a Coke, of course.
Everyone reading this site can read ingredients lists if /when they choose and knows something about them. If we are growing fr./veg. we already know something about health. I guess the only way the bright "bad"labels might affect me is, like mentioned, maybe guilting me into putting one box of something back if I noticed my whole cart was glowing red. I'd still keep the 3-4 boxes of ice cream, but maybe swap half for sherbert. I can see it now: folks turning the neon red tag sides down in their cart to avoid, "Look Mom, her whole cart's nothing but red tags!"
However, I'm afraid we do not represent the bulk of the population. Unfortunately, an alarmingly large percentage of the population is still illiterate. If they can read the word sodium, they don't know what it means. Would red tags make a difference in what folks eat? Maybe a little. Take the kids I taught (or at least attempted to); the ones whose art questions on their day 1 survey were "Who painted "The Dogs Playing Poker"?" and,"Why do you have to prime a car before you paint it?" Most of them would pay little heed to the labels, but maybe when their Dr. says it's about time for a triple bypass or they're just wanting to loose weight to attract a new man down at the "Night Owl", they might. Also, you know how some parents do anything to stop those offspring from bawling in the grocery store (heck, sometimes I'd even be willing to buy them candy to shut them up) Well, the guilt of the evil red label might cause some to make better parenting choices. And kids, if educated , might do less begging for the red label foods (but I wouldn't count on that) I guess a big skull and crossbones would be better there.
The labels would probably have the least effect on those at the highest and lowest rungs of the ladder of life. The professionals can read the fine print. The lower end is too distracted stealing copper and doing crack to look at labels, or the facilities are tied up with making meth., so they have to go out for fast food.