I still have a youngest child who is a "young adult" by any definition. Oldest child is - middle age by any definition

. Of course, we know what that makes me :/. With no grandchildren (or g grandchildren) I have to do my best to pay some attention to the teenagers!
I'm not one to decry anything that promotes/allows communication. Of course, it shouldn't be willy-nilly . . .
ummm, well "random" may be passing from the vernacular . . . Yeah, jumpin' jehoshaphat, don't go all willy-nilly!
I even saw a poster that someone says was in a middle school about thinking before you "facebook" . . . . thinking is always preferred to the alternative, anyway.
Language evolves and it evolved at a fairly steady rate
before literacy became so universal -- good/bad or otherwise. I would like to think that younger generations will continue to be able to read their language written centuries in the past. I find it wonderful to read something handwritten from 150 years ago - but, let's realize that not everyone was able to read it, then. The "bare-foot schoolboy laws" didn't become common until about 100 years ago. The Industrial Revolution brought illiterate workers into cities and the language must have exploded with new words, spellings & uses!!
We are seeing that again -- on our monitors and smart phones, if not in our own homes! Language is an important part of human culture. Useful. Artistic, at times. Rigid? Better not be unless we want an important part of culture to lose its usefulness to society and young people, especially.
Steve
