Finally 1 small victory!

897tgigvib

Garden Master
Joined
Mar 21, 2012
Messages
5,439
Reaction score
923
Points
337
Actually, as an artifact, why should a human gene be treated any different than a bacteria gene?
 

so lucky

Garden Master
Joined
Mar 5, 2011
Messages
8,342
Reaction score
4,956
Points
397
Location
SE Missouri, Zone 6
I never quite got this whole concept, anyway. A company was saying they held the patent to the gene that makes---let's say---blue eyes? Or was the patenting process intended to be for manufactured genes that could fight disease in humans? :idunno Maybe some company had the plan to sell the gene set that makes extremely beautiful babies. Now that would be a hot seller. :clap
 

journey11

Garden Master
Joined
Sep 1, 2009
Messages
8,469
Reaction score
4,218
Points
397
Location
WV, Zone 6B
From what I understood of it, they believe that by preventing patents on human genes, it will open up more research possibilities in the fight against cancer (breast cancer was cited in particular) and hopefully get us to a cure much quicker. That is largely why they made the distinction.
 

Latest posts

Top