Zeedman
Garden Master
Agreed. The widespread corruption of publicly funded breeding by industry, and the patenting of those 'products' by Big Ag, often runs contrary to the public interest. Those cultivars are often protected by highly restrictive patents, which prohibit seed saving - and even possession of plants or seed - without license. Sadly, most of the publicly funded open-pollinated breeding programs (such as those of Professor Elwyn Meader) which once developed improved varieties for the public at large, have been replaced by such programs.The first that crop/seed variety innovation suffers without patents. I'd prefer there be no patents on Creation, but, I'd have to agree that this is indeed what has happened with the OP seeds. Which is a fair price to pay. If there is no valuable reward or opportunity for growth on the part of a developer, it isn't realistic to expect anyone to want to go in that direction seriously. Especially when your work can be 'pirated' (in a way) so quickly & easily.
But open-pollinated breeding programs, and the amount of time & effort involved in them, can't reasonably be expected to continue based solely upon altruistic motives. A breeder should have the opportunity to receive reasonable compensation for what is often their life's work. In the U.S., there is a 'patent' program developed for just that purpose - the Plant Variety Protection (PVP) program. This allows open-pollinated breeders exclusive rights to produce & sell their developments for a certain amount of time. Unlike plant utility patents (such as GMOs) which are licensed & highly restrictive, no special license is required to purchase, grow, or own PVP varieties... and seed & nursery stock for PVP varieties can be marketed directly to the public. The purchaser can save seed & multiply stock for their own use - but to protect the breeder, can't legally sell or share with others. This would be a good model to protect breeders in other nations.
I strongly object to the concept of patented lifeforms, especially where that concerns anything used for food. Nothing should be allowed to infringe upon food sovereignty, the right of all people to freely choose what does - or does not - become part of one's body.